Abstract

People receive compassion when their negative actions are caused by uncontrollable factors. Or do they? In fact, existing literature provides evidence that uncontrollable bad acts often evoke compassion but sometimes can evoke negative responses. How is this possible? We propose that responses to uncontrollable bad acts differ as a function of the relational construal that is operative as a perceiver thinks about the act. In light of a communal relational construal, uncontrollable bad acts evoke compassion. In contrast, in light of a hierarchical relational construal, uncontrollable bad acts evoke apathetic or even derogatory responses. Three studies using both subtle and overt manipulations of relational construals supported these predictions. Results are discussed in terms of integrating cognitive approaches to relationships (attribution theory) with relational approaches (relational models theories), and the need for attribution-based relational interventions to consider relational construals.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.