Compartive Study between Conventional Laying-Open Technique with Sphincter Repair and Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) in Treatment of High Trans-Sphincteric Perianal Fistula

Abstract

Abstract Background Complex anal fistula has been a hot topic in clinic. Many surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of such anal fistula, including the use of seton, fibrin glue, collagen plugs, rectal advancement flaps, fistulotomy with sphincter repair, and rerouting the fistula tract. However, the results have been variable, and no one procedure is superior to the others absolutely. It is worth our concern that the goal of any treatment procedure is to obliterate the tract and to have low recurrence rates while maintaining full continence. A fistulotomy lays open the fistulous tract, thus leaving smaller unepithelized wounds, which hastens the wound healing. Until now, fistulotomy is still the most widely used. But, the high cure rate is limited by the fact that laying open a transsphincteric fistula tract and cutting both the internal and the external sphincter has the risk of fecal incontinence ranging up to 40%. Objective To retrospectively evaluate the success rate, the recurrence and incontinence when using the Conventional laying-open and sphincter Repair technique in comparison to Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) for treating high trans-shpincteric perianal fistula. Patients and Methods This was a cohort retrospective, comparative study that was conducted on cases of fistula in the anus, who were subjected to surgery in Ain Shams University Hospitals and Ain shams specialized hospitals in the period from October 2021 to March 2022 (at least 30 cases) to evaluate the success rate, the recurrence rate, and incontinence rate when using the conventional laying open with sphincter repair technique compared to ligation of inter-sphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) For High trans-sphincteric perianal fistula. Results Regarding Relation of recurrence with demographic data of the studied patients, de novo/recurrent, Wexner score before and after operation and complications. that there was no statistically significant relation found recurrence with demographic data of the studied patients, de novo/recurrent, Wexner score before and after operation while there was statistically significant relation found with complications. Conclusion LIFT procedure is an effective and preferred sphincter-saving technique for fistula-inano with shorter healing time and lower incidence of postoperative anal incontinence, but have higher incidence of recurrence as compared to conventional layopen with sphincter repair which have a lower incidence of recurrence but have a relatively longer Healing time and higher incidence of postoperative anal incontinence. Both techniques are effective, have post operative good results and safe in treatment of high transsphincteric perianal fistula but Further research work is still warranted to confirm the long term outcome of these 2 techniques with a larger sample size and a longer follow up period. To know which technique is superior over the other.