Abstract
The aim of this presented study was to evaluate the survival and success rates implants with immediate and conventional placement. The second aim of this study was to evaluate and compared the crestal bone and gingival margin level around the implants in each groups.
Highlights
Immediate implant placement has gained popularity because it can reduce treatment time, number of surgeries and post-extraction bone loss [1,2]
Mean marginal bone resorption was calculated at 0.7 ± 0.5 mm for test group and 0.6 ± 0.6 for control group after at least 1 year in function
Both initially and after 12 months, gingival recession values were found similar for each group (p ≤ 0.05)
Summary
30 immediate implants in 26 patients (test group) and 34 conventional implants in 26 patients (control group) were evaluated. All implants at least 12 months follow-up. The change in the level of crestal bone was measured on standardized digital panaromic radiographt and gingival margin recession values were evaluated in clinically, third months, and twelfth months for each patient.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
