Comparisons of Reflectivities from the TRMM Precipitation Radar and Ground-Based Radars

Abstract

Abstract Given the decade-long and highly successful Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM), it is now possible to provide quantitative comparisons between ground-based radars (GRs) and the spaceborne TRMM precipitation radar (PR) with greater certainty over longer time scales in various tropical climatological regions. This study develops an automated methodology to match and compare simultaneous TRMM PR and GR reflectivities at four primary TRMM Ground Validation (GV) sites: Houston, Texas (HSTN); Melbourne, Florida (MELB); Kwajalein, Republic of the Marshall Islands (KWAJ); and Darwin, Australia (DARW). Data from each instrument are resampled into a three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system. The horizontal displacement during the PR data resampling is corrected. Comparisons suggest that the PR suffers significant attenuation at lower levels, especially in convective rain. The attenuation correction performs quite well for convective rain but appears to slightly overcorrect in stratiform rain. The PR and GR observations at HSTN, MELB, and KWAJ agree to about ±1 dB on average with a few exceptions, whereas the GR at DARW requires +1 to −5 dB calibration corrections. One of the important findings of this study is that the GR calibration offset is dependent on the reflectivity magnitude. Hence, it is proposed that the calibration should be carried out by using a regression correction rather than by simply adding an offset value to all GR reflectivities. This methodology is developed to assist TRMM GV efforts to improve the accuracy of tropical rain estimates, but can also be applied to the proposed Global Precipitation Measurement and other related activities over the globe.