Abstract
The goal of this paper was to find the differences of the channel models and parameters as well as the correlations of the channel parameters between 2 GHz and 5 GHz with 100 MHz bandwidth when measurements were performed in exactly the same routes for urban microcells. The path-loss models and shadow fading were studied by using single-input single-output (SISO) measurements. The channel characteristics were investigated by the rms delay spread, rms angular spread, shadow fading, Ricean factor, number of clusters, cross-polar discrimination, and channel capacities using both SISO and MIMO (multiple-input multiple-output) measurements. Static measurements at 5 GHz were also performed in both micro- and macro-cells to investigate clustering effects. Moreover, the channel models and parameters were compared with WINNER work to test their validity in urban microcells. The main conclusion was that the 2 GHz and 5 GHz frequencies can have different propagation behaviors causing the independent channel parameters. However, it was found that their coherence bandwidths were highly correlated. The WINNER path-loss models over-estimate the path losses, both in the line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) street canyons where strong guided waves exist. Irrespective of carrier frequencies, the channel parameters offered by WINNER may roughly estimate the channel by implementing its generic model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.