Abstract

ABSTRACT Flipped classroom in pharmacy education has been widely explored with a major focus on its effectiveness but little emphasis is given to assess the different in-class activities. Therefore, this work compares two in-class activities in an overall flipped classroom: analogical learning and team-based learning (TBL) for a pharmacy course. The students underwent flipped classrooms with recorded lectures for different topics and followed by different assigned in-class activities. The final exam performance and a survey gauging their opinions on the experience were obtained and analysed. Analysis of covariance results showed no difference in the exam grade between the activities but normalised-gain score demonstrated moderately to highly effective for both activities. Despite this, the students rated lower for TBL experience due to the poor participation. Nevertheless, the current comparisons exhibited the benefits of different interactive in-class activities and the need for a careful design based on the students’ interest and engagement levels.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.