Comparisons between two methods of multifetal pregnancy reduction in women with a dichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the different pregnancy outcomes of women with a reduced dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplet managed with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or potassium chloride (KCL). Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study. We studied 30 women of DCTA triplets managed with RFA as well as 85 managed with KCL. We compared the mean neonatal birthweight, median gestational age and perinatal mortality of two groups. ResultsThe mean neonatal birthweight of children in RFA group was 2572.4 g (SD, 407.0), vs 2899.3 g (SD, 554.9) in KCL group (P < 0.001). The rate of low birth weight infants was 23 (42.6%) vs. 16 (18.0%), respectively, (p < 0.005). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the median gestational age of delivery, premature birth before 32&37 weeks' gestation, neonatal brain injury or successful pregnancy between two groups. (We define the successful pregnancy as the condition that at least one child survives for a specific woman, while the failed one as no child survives.) ConclusionWhat we took it for granted was that pregnancy outcomes in women with a reduced DCTA triplet managed with RFA was riskier than with KCL, however, we proved that it is not accurate. For women with a reduced DCTA triplet, managed with RFA is not much riskier than with KCL. What's more, most women have two children survived in RFA group, while in KCL group, only one child survives for most women. This result may change the management alternative for those women with DCTA triplet pregnancies who choose reduction, especially for women who desire to have two surviving and healthy fetuses.