Comparison, Validation, and Use of Models for Predicting Indoor Air Quality from Soil and Groundwater Contamination

Abstract

The use of models to predict indoor air quality and health risk for the soil vapor transport to indoor air pathway is commonplace; however, there is significant uncertainty surrounding processes and factors affecting this pathway, and the accuracy of models used. Available screening models were evaluated through a review of model characteristics and sensitivity, and through comparisons to measured conditions at field sites. Model simulations and comparisons to field data indicate that the vapor attenuation ratio (α) is highly sensitive to certain processes (e.g., biodegradation and ad-vection) and input parameters. Comparisons of model predicted to measured a values indicate that models based on the Johnson and Ettinger (1991) framework in most cases result in predictions that are conservative by up to one to two orders of magnitude for field sites that were assessed, providing that appropriate input parameters are used. However, for sites where the advection potential is high, these models may not be conservative. The potential for advective transport of vapors into building may be significant for sites with shallow contamination, high permeability soil and foundation and high building underpressurization. The paper concludes with possible tiered management framework for the soil vapor pathway.