Abstract
ABSTRACT THE tractive performance of a forestry tire (FOR) was determined on three field surfaces using the single wheel tester of the National Institute of Agricultural Engineering (NIAE), Silsoe, England and was compared with the performance of an agricultural tire (AGR) of the same dimensions (67X34-25). The tractive efficiency of the AGR tire was 6% to 10% higher than the FOR tire; similarly, the motion resistance ratio of the FOR tire was higher than the AGR tire (0.11 vs 0.07) because of the difference in design and construction of the two tires.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
