Abstract

PurposeTo compare a biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) with a partial coherence interferometry (PCI)-based biometer in measurements of two ocular biometry parameters, i.e., the axial length and anterior cornea curvature.MethodsWe compared the two biometers SS-OCT (ANTERION, Heidelberg Engineering Inc., Heidelberg, Germany) and PCI (IOL Master, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) in terms of the axial length (AL) and corneal curvature (K) measurements of 175 eyes. Paired t-tests were used to compare the two biometers. Agreement between the biometers was evaluated using the Bland–Altman method.ResultsThe mean age was 36.0 ± 25.6 years (range: 5 to 85 years). The mean axial length was 24.42 ± 0.13 mm for SS-OCT and 24.45 ± 0.14 mm for PCI. The mean corneal curvature was significantly different between the two biometry in flat K (K1) but not in steep K (K2). The limit of agreement was -0.15 to 0.21 in the axial length, -1.18 to 0.83 in K1, and -1.06 to 0.95 in K2. All above ocular biometric measurements between SS-OCT and PCI correlated significantly (Pearson's correlation, p<0.001).ConclusionsThe axial length measured using SS-OCT is useful in clinical practice. It shows a good correlation and agreement with that measured using PCI. However, the axial length and corneal curvature measured using SS-OCT cannot be used interchangeably with that measured using PCI in clinical practice.

Highlights

  • The precise measurement of the axial length is important in the field of ophthalmology owing to various applications

  • The mean corneal curvature was significantly different between the two biometry in flat K (K1) but not in steep K (K2)

  • The axial length measured using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) is useful in clinical practice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The precise measurement of the axial length is important in the field of ophthalmology owing to various applications. To calculate the axial length, the ultrasonographic A-scan is the traditional method, and partial coherence interferometry (PCI), such as IOLMaster500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), is a popular technique. This device measures the axial length by calculating the time difference between the reflected rays using 780-nm infrared beam of shortcoherence light with only a single refractive index, the refractive index of each tissue is different. Because it employs non-contact biometry, it is not significantly affected by the proficiency of the examiner, and its accuracy and reproducibility are superior to those of the A-scan [3]

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.