Abstract
This research aims to comparative analysis about technology acceptance model (TAM) variables; perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and attitude (ATT) of interviewers in using conventional paper and pencil interview (PAPI) and computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) as data collection methods. The data were collected from two groups of interviewer, with a total of 334 interviewers. Analyses were conducted within each group and then compared using t-test using JASP 0.17.2.1. The findings showed that the two groups of PAPI and CAPI interviewers differed in their usage of survey methods. This research will assist organizations in planning the transformation of survey methods from PAPI to CAPI. It will also contribute to the understanding of the differences in interviewers' perceptions towards these two data collection methods.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Informatics and Communication Technology (JICT)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
