Abstract
In low-income countries, the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is most frequently achieved using Ziehl Neelsen (ZN) microscopy rather than the GeneXpert system. The performance of the former has not been evaluated against the latter in Ethiopia. A total of 180 PTB-suspected patients were enrolled in our study. Sputum specimens were tested both by ZN microscopy and geneXpert. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ZN microscopy were 75%, 99.4%, 92.3%, and 97.6%, respectively. The Kappa value of agreement between the two diagnosis methods was 0.80. We concluded that there was a good agreement between ZN microscopy and the reference Xpert assay, which suggests that ZN microscopy is still a good diagnostic method in health care facilities that do not have the latter test.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
