Comparison of X-Ray-Induced Mutation Rates in Drosophila and Mice

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessComparison of X-Ray-Induced Mutation Rates in Drosophila and MiceW. L. RussellW. L. Russell Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 90, Number 850Jan. - Feb., 1956Supplement: Comparison of X-Ray-Induced Mutation Rates in Drosophila and Mice Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/281910 Views: 8Total views on this site Citations: 28Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Edward J. Calabrese, Paul B. Selby Cover up and cancer risk assessment: Prominent US scientists suppressed evidence to promote adoption of LNT, Environmental Research 210 (Jul 2022): 112973.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.112973Robert Erickson Mutation studies including those targeting the T/t-complex—a century long project, (Jan 2022): 145–160.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824016-8.00004-0Nori Nakamura History of radiation genetics: light and darkness, International Journal of Radiation Biology 95, no.77 (Feb 2019): 999–1014.https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2019.1572251Edward J. Calabrese The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate, Environmental Research 154 (Apr 2017): 435–451.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.006Robert L. Brent Protocol 2: Ionizing Radiation, (Apr 2015): 14–26.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119001256.ch2Liane B. Russell The Mouse House: A brief history of the ORNL mouse-genetics program, 1947–2009, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 753, no.22 (Oct 2013): 69–90.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.08.003Edward J. Calabrese Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose–response concept, Archives of Toxicology 87, no.99 (Jul 2013): 1621–1633.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-013-1104-7James V. Neel Changing perspectives on the genetic doubling dose of ionizing radiation for humans, mice, andDrosophila, Teratology 59, no.44 (Apr 1999): 216–221.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199904)59:4<216::AID-TERA5>3.0.CO;2-OJames V. Neel Reappraisal of studies concerning the genetic effects of the radiation of humans, mice, and Drosophila, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 31, no.11 (Jan 1998): 4–10.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1998)31:1<4::AID-EM2>3.0.CO;2-OLiane B. Russell Role of mouse germ-cell mutagenesis in understanding genetic risk and in generating mutations that are prime tools for studies in modern biology, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 23, no.S2S2 (Jan 1994): 23–29.https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2850230608M. Hultcrantz, M. Anniko, E. Borg Structure and Function of the Adult Cochlea Following Prenatal Irradiation, Acta Oto-Laryngologica 100, no.sup425sup425 (Jul 2009): 4–31.https://doi.org/10.3109/00016488509121607W. L. Russell Problems and Solutions in the Estimation of Genetic Risks from Radiation and Chemicals, (Jan 1981): 361–384.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4052-2_18Seymour Abrahamson, Sheldon Wolff Re-analysis of radiation-induced specific locus mutations in the mouse, Nature 264, no.55885588 (Dec 1976): 715–719.https://doi.org/10.1038/264715a0Sheldon Wolff Estimation of the effects of chemical mutagens: Lessons from radiation genetics, Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 33, no.11 (Nov 1975): 95–102.https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(75)90050-0A.G. Searle Mutation Induction in Mice, (Jan 1974): 131–207.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-035404-7.50010-3L. P. Jones Effects of X-rays on response to selection for a quantitative character of Drosophila melanogaster, Genetical Research 9, no.22 (Apr 2009): 221–231.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300010508Mary F. Lyon, T. Morris Mutation rates at a new set of specific loci in the mouse, Genetical Research 7, no.11 (Apr 2009): 12–17.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300009435H. B. Newcombe Genetic effects of ionizing radiations, (Jan 1966): 487–632.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-99899-7_8Aloha Hannah-Alava The Premeiotic Stages of Spermatogenesis, (Jan 1965): 157–226.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60049-8Aloha Hannah-Alava The brood-pattern of X-ray-induced mutational damage in the germ cells of Drosophila melanogaster males, Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 1, no.44 (Dec 1964): 414–436.https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(64)90035-1Mary F. Lyon, Rita J. S. Phillips, A. G. Searle The overall rates of dominant and recessive lethal and visible mutation induced by spermatogonial X-irradiation of mice, Genetical Research 5, no.33 (Apr 2009): 448–467.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300034893H. GRÜNEBERG Genetical Research in an Area of High Natural Radioactivity in South India, Nature 204, no.49554955 (Oct 1964): 222–224.https://doi.org/10.1038/204222a0ANITA M. MANDL THE RADIOSENSITIVITY OF GERM CELLS, Biological Reviews 39, no.33 (Aug 1964): 288–367.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1964.tb01161.xK.G. Lüning Studies of irradiated mouse populations III. Accumulation of recessive lethals, Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 1, no.11 (May 1964): 86–98.https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(64)90055-7Josef Warkany, Harold Kalter Congenital Malformations, New England Journal of Medicine 265, no.2121 (Nov 1961): 1046–1052.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196111232652106Bruce M. Cattanach A chemically-induced variegated-type position effect in the mouse, Zeitschrift f�r Vererbungslehre 92, no.22 (Jan 1961): 165–182.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00890283G. Failla THE AGING PROCESS AND CANCEROGENESIS, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 71, no.6 Genetic Conce6 Genetic Conce (Sep 1958): 1124–1140.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1958.tb46828.x Recessive lethal mutation induced in the mouse by chronic γ -irradiation, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences 147, no.928928 (Jan 1997): 402–411.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1957.0059