Abstract
Target strength (TS) is one of the main parameters for determining fish density, abundance and biomass in acoustic technique. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to obtain an accurate TS estimate and to minimize bias from its measurement. Various factors contribute to bias in acoustic TS, namely the high diversity of species, body shape, size and also frequencies used. In this paper we compare and examine the acoustic narrowband (NB) and wideband (WB) approaches to better understand the TS response to various frequencies. The use of acoustic wideband approach, is expected to perform better and be less-biased than the narrowband, which is still widely used. The measurement of bullet tuna (Auxis rochei) and bonito (Euthynnus affinis) for the same fork length (FL) size showed the power of four frequency dependent (f^4). Furthermore, a comparison between NB frequency of 200 kHz versus WB at the nearby frequencies of 190-200 kHz and 200-210 kHz showed a significant Pearson correlation value for bonito fish size range from 17-26.6 cm, whereas in the case of bullet tuna, fish had no significant correlation at alpha=0.05 for fish size range from 16.4-26 cm.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.