Comparison of vocal outcome following two different procedures for immediate RLN reconstruction

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

The objective of this study was to compare time-dependent improvements in phonatory function and stroboscopic findings following two different procedures for immediate reconstruction of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) during neck tumor extirpation. Seventeen patients with neck tumors, consisting of advanced thyroid cancer (n = 15), metastatic neck lymph nodes from other malignant lesions (n = 2), underwent resection of the primary lesion and involved RLN. Immediate RLN reconstruction by either: (1) ansa cervicalis nerve (ACN) to RLN anastomosis (n = 8); or (2) placement of the great auricular nerve (GAN) between the cut ends of the RLN (n = 9) was performed from 2000 to 2011. Phonatory function [maximum phonation time, mean airflow rate (MFR), jitter, and shimmer) and stroboscopic findings (regularity, amplitude, and glottal gap) were examined at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Stroboscopic findings were assessed by two otolaryngologists and one speech pathologist. There were no significant differences in any parameter for either phonatory function or stroboscopic findings between ACN and GAN with the exception of jitter and shimmer, in which ACN was superior to GAN at 1 month postoperatively. All parameters improved significantly between 1 and 12 months postoperatively for both phonatory function and stroboscopic findings (P < 0.05). Either method of immediate RLN reconstruction at the time of neck tumor extirpation (i.e., ACN or GAN) provided both excellent long-term postoperative phonatory function and stroboscopic findings, and there was little difference in vocal outcome between the two procedures.