Comparison of vehicles to collect dentinal fluid for molecular analysis

Abstract

ObjectivesTo test the hypothesis that a material with higher water absorption than polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) could increase the yield of target molecules from exposed dentine. MethodsIn a series of standard tests, different cellulose membranes were compared to a PVDF counterpart for their ability to absorb water and release protein. In a subsequent randomized clinical trial, the cellulose material with the most favourable values was compared to PVDF regarding the levels of MMP-2 that could be collected from exposed dentine of healthy human teeth during filling replacement. MMP-2 levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data from the laboratory experiments were compared between materials using the appropriate parametric tests. The frequency of cases yielding quantifiable levels of MMP-2 was compared between materials by Fisher's exact test. The level of significance was set at 5%. ResultsThe cellulose membrane with the largest pore size (12–15μm) absorbed significantly (P<0.05) more water than PVDF. It showed a protein release that was similar to that of PVDF, while the cellulose membranes with smaller pore size retained significantly more protein (P<0.05). Using the large-pore cellulose membrane, MMP-2 could be collected at a quantifiable level from the dentine of healthy teeth in 9 of 13 cases, compared to 1 of 13 with the PVDF membrane (P<0.05). ConclusionsUnder the current conditions, a large-pore cellulose membrane yielded more of a molecule of diagnostic value compared to a standard PVDF membrane. Clinical significanceMolecular diagnostics of dentinal fluid are hampered by low yields. In the current study, it was shown that cellulose membranes are more useful to collect MMP-2 from dentinal fluid than PVDF membranes.