Abstract
ABSTRACTThe solar ultraviolet (UV) index from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) onboard NASA EOS/Aura satellite is compared with that derived from ground‐based multi‐channel filter radiometers at four sites in the tropical environment of Thailand. The sites include Chiang Mai (18.78°N, 98.98°E), Ubon Ratchathani (15.25°N, 104.87°E), Nakhon Pathom (13.82°N, 100.04°E) and Songkhla (7.2°N, 100.6°E). At these sites, aerosol optical depth is monitored using sunphotometers and cloud images are taken by sky cameras. The comparison results clearly show the overestimation of OMI UV index because of influences by aerosols and clouds. The differences between the two datasets lie between 38.1 and 60.7% for all sky conditions, and reduce to 22.5–50.3% for clear sky conditions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
