Abstract

Knowledge about use of health care services (health care utilization) and expenditures among unauthorized immigrant populations is uncertain because of limitations in ascertaining legal status in population data. To examine health care utilization and expenditures that are attributable to unauthorized and authorized immigrants vs US-born individuals. This cross-sectional study used the data on documentation status from the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey (LAFANS) to develop a random forest classifier machine learning model. K-fold cross-validation was used to test model performance. The LAFANS is a randomized, multilevel, in-person survey of households residing in Los Angeles County, California, consisting of 2 waves. Wave 1 began in April 2000 and ended in January 2002, and wave 2 began in August 2006 and ended in December 2008. The machine learning model was then applied to a nationally representative database, the 2016-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), to predict health care expenditures and utilization among unauthorized and authorized immigrants and US-born individuals. A generalized linear model analyzed health care expenditures. Logistic regression modeling estimated dichotomous use of emergency department (ED), inpatient, outpatient, and office-based physician visits by immigrant groups with adjusting for confounding factors. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2019, to October 14, 2020. Self-reported immigration status (US-born, authorized, and unauthorized status). Annual health care expenditures per capita and use of ED, outpatient, inpatient, and office-based physician care. Of 47 199 MEPS respondents with nonmissing data, 35 079 (74.3%) were US born, 10 816 (22.9%) were authorized immigrants, and 1304 (2.8%) were unauthorized immigrants (51.7% female; mean age, 47.6 [95% CI, 47.4-47.8] years). Compared with authorized immigrants and US-born individuals, unauthorized immigrants were more likely to be aged 18 to 44 years (80.8%), Latino (96.3%), and Spanish speaking (95.2%) and to have less than 12 years of education (53.7%). Half of unauthorized immigrants (47.1%) were uninsured compared with 15.9% of authorized immigrants and 6.0% of US-born individuals. Mean annual health care expenditures per person were $1629 (95% CI, $1330-$1928) for unauthorized immigrants, $3795 (95% CI, $3555-$4035) for authorized immigrants, and $6088 (95% CI, $5935-$6242) for US-born individuals. Contrary to much political discourse in the US, this cross-sectional study found no evidence that unauthorized immigrants are a substantial economic burden on safety net facilities such as EDs. This study illustrates the value of machine learning in the study of unauthorized immigrants using large-scale, secondary databases.

Highlights

  • Immigration, unauthorized immigration, continues to be a major topic of social and political debate in the US.[1]

  • Contrary to much political discourse in the US, this crosssectional study found no evidence that unauthorized immigrants are a substantial economic burden

  • Of 47 199 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) respondents with nonmissing data (51.7% female and 48.3% male; mean [SD] age, 47.6 [95% CI, 47.4-47.8] years), 35 079 (74.3%) were US born, 10 816 (22.9%) were authorized immigrants, and 1304 (2.8%) were unauthorized immigrants (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Immigration, unauthorized immigration, continues to be a major topic of social and political debate in the US.[1] Much of the discourse has centered on the presumption that unauthorized immigrants disproportionately rely on public benefits programs, and this is considered a primary reason that they attempt to migrate to the US.[1] This assumption has provided partial justification for construction of a security barrier on the southern US border These preconceptions have been difficult to refute because limited data are available on unauthorized immigrants. Few large-scale surveys of unauthorized immigrants have been attempted, surveys of health status and use of health care services (health care utilization) One such survey is the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey (LAFANS).[3] The LAFANS is a large, publicly available, secondary database based on a robust randomized sampling design that can be used to study the health and health care utilization of unauthorized immigrants. Other surveys, such as the California Health Interview Survey, the National Health Interview Survey, and the Survey of Income and Program Participation, either restrict access to data on visa status or do not separately identify unauthorized immigrants from those having a legally valid visa.[4,5]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call