Abstract
This is the first report to present a clinical comparison of unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) and HLA-matched sibling allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in advanced stage (accelerated phase or blast crisis). A total of 32 consecutive patients with advanced CML received unrelated CBT (n = 16) or HLA-matched sibling allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation (allo-PBSCT/BMT) (n = 16) between 2002 and 2011. The median day to neutrophil engraftment and the median day to platelet engraftment were longer in the unrelated CBT group. The cumulative incidence of grades 1 to 2 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), grades 3 to 4 aGVHD, and chronic graft-versus-host disease did not differ significantly between the 2 cohorts. The cumulative incidence of transplantation-related mortality (TRM) at day +180 was higher in CBT group (37.5% versus 12.5%, P = .013). The risk of relapse was lower in CBT patients compared with that of allo-PBSCT/BMT patients (14.2% versus 42.7%, P = .03). The long-term survival in CBT group patients was slightly better than that of allo-PBSCT/BMT group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance: the 5-year overall survival for CBT patients and allo-PBSCT/BMT patients was 62.5% and 48.6%, respectively (P = .10), whereas the 5-year leukemia-free-survival rate was 50% and 40.5%, respectively (P = .12). Our comparisons suggest that patients with advanced CML receiving unrelated CBT had a lower relapse rate, a slightly better long-term survival, but a higher early TRM than those receiving HLA-matched related allo-PBSCT/BMT.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.