Comparison of Two Proposed Changes to the Current Nodal Classification for Non--small Cell Lung Cancer Based on the Number and Ratio of Metastatic Lymph Nodes

Abstract

The current nodal classification is unsatisfactory in distinguishing the prognostically heterogeneous N1 or N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Is the combination of the current N category and the number of metastatic lymph nodes (N-#number) or the combination of the current N category and the ratio of the number of positive to resected lymph nodes (N-#ratio) better than the current N category alone? We identified 2,162 patients with N1 or N2 NSCLC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016). We classified these patients into three N-#number categories (N-#number-1, N-#number-2a, N-#number-2b) and three N-#ratio categories (N-#ratio-1, N-#ratio-2a, N-#ratio-2b). Lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic significance of the new nodal classifications was validated across each tumor size category (≤3cm, 3-5cm, 5-7cm, >7cm). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between each nodal classification and LCSS. The survival curves showed clear differences between each pair of N-#number and N-#ratio categories. A significant tendency toward the deterioration of LCSS from N-#number-1 to N-#number-2b was observed in all tumor size categories. However, the differences between each pair of N-#ratio categories were significant only in tumors from 3 to 7cm. Although all three nodal classifications were independent prognostic indicators, the N-#number classification provided more accurate prognostic stratifications compared with the N-#ratio classification and the current nodal classification. The N-#number classification followed by the N-#ratio classification might be better prognostic determinants than the current nodal classification in prognostically heterogeneous N1 or N2 NSCLC.