Abstract
Two multichannel tactile devices for the hearing-impaired were compared in tasks using acoustic stimuli of varying levels of complexity. One device was a 16-element linear vibratory array worn on the forearm, which displayed activity in 16 overlapping frequency channels. The other device utilized 16 channels in a similar stimulus processing strategy, but delivered the tactile stimulation to a linear electrocutaneous array worn on the abdomen. Subjects were tested in tasks including phoneme discrimination in pairs of rhyming syllables, phoneme identification in larger sets of rhyming syllables, learning of a list of words, and connected discourse tracking. All stimuli were presented live-voice by a female talker, and lipreading was permitted only in the tracking task. Results showed both devices to be good transmitters of manner and voicing features of articulation, but poor transmitters of place features. Differences between the two devices were found only at the level of connected discourse tracking. Results are discussed in terms of differences between the two devices in processing strategy, location of stimulator array, and type of transducer. [Work supported by NSF and NIH.]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.