Abstract
The potentialities of the infrared photoacoustic method and the ATR Golden Gate method for the measurements of oriented bulk polymer systems are compared. Both methods are suitable for the estimation of orientation, if low and medium intensity bands are used. The ATR Golden Gate method is faster, while the photoacoustic method gives more straightforward results and eliminates any possible effect on the sample.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
