Comparison of Two Load Prediction Methods for Strain-Gage Balances

Abstract

Data from a five-component semi-span balance is used to perform a systematic comparison of the load prediction accuracy of two load prediction methods. Both methods independently obtain the load prediction equations from multivariate least squares fits of balance calibration data. The first method is called the Non-Iterative Method. This approach directly uses regression models of the individual load components of a balance for the load prediction. The second method is called the Iterative Method. This alternate approach uses a load iteration equation for the load prediction that is constructed from the regression coefficients of the gage outputs of the balance. Basic characteristics of the two methods are reviewed. Afterwards, both methods are applied to calibration, check load, and wind tunnel test data of a five-component semi-span balance. Selected analysis results are compared. These comparisons confirm that the accuracy of the two methods is the same for all practical purposes.