Abstract
Abstract Objectives This study systematically compared the performance and comparability of two medical laboratory analytical instruments, the conventional wet chemistry analyzer (cobas) and the dry slide technology (Vitros), across various clinical chemistry assays. Methods The evaluation focused on assessing imprecision, inaccuracy, recovery, and method comparison using leftover patient serum samples. Results The results indicated good to very good agreement for most clinical chemistry analytes, with larger differences observed for comparison of serum patient samples on albumin and protein. Conclusions Understanding and acknowledging method-specific variations, are crucial for accurate result interpretation in clinical laboratories. This study contributes valuable insights to ongoing discussions on method standardization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
