Comparison of two different inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometric procedures and high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection in the determination of iodine in urine

Abstract

A comparison between two ICP-MS methods and HPLC with electrochemical detection (ED) for the determination of iodine is described. The first ICP-MS method involves 10-fold dilution with water using Rh as internal standard and the calibration graph was obtained with a synthetic urine. In the second ICP-MS method the sample preparation provided a 5-fold dilution with water using In as internal standard and adding nitric acid and the calibration graph was obtained by making additions to a pool of human urine samples. In the HPLC method, the urine was previously purified from organic substances through an SPE C18 column and the final portion was collected. The chromatographic column used was a C18 reversed-phase column and a silver working electrode was used versus a Pd/Pt reference electrode for ED. The calibration graph was obtained with a synthetic urine. The results show that the two ICP-MS methods are comparable in terms of analytical parameters such as precision and limit of detection. Good agreement between both ICP-MS procedures and HPLC–ED was also obtained, although the limit of detection was higher in HPLC–ED and the linear dynamic range was wider in both ICP-MS methods.