Comparison of Two Bone Grafting Techniques Applied During Posterior C1-C2 Screw-Rod Fixation and Fusion for Treating Reducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Abstract

Several bone grafting techniques for posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis have been reported. The techniques of placing a cancellous morselized bone graft (MBG) on decorticated surfaces of the atlantoaxial complex and securing a structural iliac bone graft (SBG) between C1 and C2 have been used widely. The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of these 2 bone grafting techniques for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. The data from 64 patients with reducible atlantoaxial dislocation treated using posterior C1-C2 screw-rod fixation and fusion were retrospectively reviewed. The MBG technique had been used in 32 patients and the SBG technique in 32 patients. The time required for bone fusion was recorded. The outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale score, Neck Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS) score for neck pain, patient satisfaction, and neck stiffness and compared between the 2 groups. The donor site complications were also compared, and donor site pain was assessed using a VAS. At the final follow-up, the bone fusion rate was 100% in both groups. No significant differences were found in the bone fusion time or donor site pain between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Postoperatively, The Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale scores, Neck Disability Index, and VAS score for neck pain had improved significantly within both groups (P < 0.05), with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Additionally, no differences were found between the 2 groups in patient satisfaction and neck stiffness postoperatively (P > 0.05). The MBG and SBG techniques were both effective for atlantoaxial arthrodesis, with the advantages of reducing the potential risk of catastrophic bleeding of the epidural venous plexus and C2 nerve root injury.