Comparison of treatment plans between static jaw and jaw tracking techniques in postmastectomy intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Abstract

This study reports a dosimetric comparison between treatment plans using static jaw and jaw tracking techniques in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Seventeen patients treated for left-sided breast cancer with implant-based reconstruction were subjected to IMRT plans. Another group of 22 patients treated for left-sided breast cancer without reconstruction was also subjected to IMRT plans. The plans were generated using the Eclipse treatment planning system with static jaw and jaw tracking techniques. The dose-volume histograms and dosimetric indices, such as mean dose (Dmean), V20 Gy, V10 Gy, and V5 Gy (volumes receiving 20, 10, and 5Gy at the least, respectively), and generalized equivalent uniform dose for organs at risk (OARs) were analyzed. A significant difference in the value of the dosimetric indices between the static jaw and jaw tracking plans was observed. For jaw tracking plans,the Dmean of the heart for the patients with implant-based reconstruction reduced from 11.6 ± 1.1Gy to 10.0 ± 1.8Gy, whereas the V5 Gy reduced from 92.0 ± 4.5% to 85.1 ± 8.4%. The Dmean of the heart for patients without reconstruction reduced from 11.0 ± 2.3Gy to 9.8 ± 2.6Gy, whereas the V5 Gy reduced from 81.4 ± 13.6% to 66.7 ± 17.4%. The dosimetric indices of OARs in the jaw tracking plans were significantly lower than those of the OARs in the static jaw plans. The jaw tracking technique was more effective for patients without reconstruction than for those with implant-based reconstruction.