Abstract
ObjectivesTo compare traumatic spinal injury patterns between motorcyclists and occupants of other non-heavy motor vehicles using data from the National Spinal Cord and Column Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR). MethodsAll drivers/riders and passengers of motorcycles, cars, pick-up trucks, and vans registered between January 2017 to July 2023, met the inclusion criteria for the present study. The logistic regression models were used to compare the patterns of vertebral fracture between the two groups. Results1726 spinal fracture patients were identified, 385 (22.3%) motorcyclists and 1341 (77.7%) car occupants with mean ages 33.2±14.3 and 36.1±13.6 years, respectively (P<0.001). Only 45 (11.7%) motorcyclists used helmets, whereas 856 (63.8%) car occupants used seat belts (P<0.001). The average numbers of fractured vertebrae were 3.9±1.4 and 3.7±1.1 among car occupants and motorcyclists, respectively (P=0.004). The proportions of motorcyclists and car occupants with injuries in each spinal region are as follows: lumbar (50.5% of motorcyclists vs. 40.4% of car occupants; P=0.003), thoracic (39.2% vs. 30.9%; P=0.01), cervical (24.3% vs. 37.0%; P<0.001) and sacral (1.3% vs. 7.5%; P<0.001). The AO Spine type C injuries were present in 6.1% of motorcyclists and 10.1% of car occupants (P=0.03). ConclusionMotorcyclists were younger, less educated, had a higher proportion of males, and less commonly used safety devices than car occupants. The most commonly fractured spine region among both groups was the lumbar region. The cervical and sacral vertebrae fractures were significantly more common in car occupants, whereas the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae fractures were significantly more common in motorcyclists.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.