Abstract
ObjectivePorous tantalum implantation (PTI) and bone impaction grafting (BIG) through a window at the femoral head neck junction are known as two types of joint‐preserving procedures. They provide an alternative option in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head by providing strong structural support to the subchondral plate. However, when earlier joint‐preserving treatments fail, conversion to a total hip arthroplasty seems to be the final treatment of choice. This emphasizes the importance of joint‐preserving procedures that do not hinder the clinical results of a subsequent total hip arthroplasty. The results of conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed PTI and BIG are still controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after failed PTI or BIG surgery with primary total hip arthroplasty.MethodsPatients at our institution between 2010 and 2014 who underwent total hip arthroplasty after failed PTI or BIG surgery compared to primary total hip arthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 27 patients (30 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty after failed PTI surgery (group I) were matched according to age, gender and BMI index with 28 patients (30 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty after failed BIG surgery (group II) and 30 patients (30 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (group III). The clinical results included preoperative and postoperative Harris Hip score, surgery duration, blood loss volume and clinical complications. Radiological follow‐up results included abduction angle and anteversion angle of the acetabular cup, periprosthetic osteolysis, and prosthesis subsidence.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the preoperative and postoperative Harris Hip score among the three groups at the latest follow‐up (P = 0.247). The surgery duration was longer and intra‐operative blood loss volume was higher in group I than in group II and group III (P < 0.05, respectively). There was no difference in surgery duration and blood loss volume between group II and group III (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in radiological follow‐up results among the three groups (P > 0.05). Varying degrees of residual tantalum debris were seen on postoperative radiographs of all group I patients. There was no difference in the incidence of complications among the three groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionsPTI group had higher blood loss volume and surgery duration than BIG group and primary total hip arthroplasty group. BIG group had no significant differences with primary total hip arthroplasty group in clinical and radiological follow‐up results. There were no significant differences between the three groups in the Harris Hip score and radiological follow‐up results.
Highlights
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a common refractory and progressive disease usually affecting young and middle-aged orthopaedic patients
bone impaction grafting (BIG) group had no significant differences with primary total hip arthroplasty group in clinical and radiological follow-up results
There were no significant differences between the three groups in the Harris Hip score and radiological follow-up results
Summary
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a common refractory and progressive disease usually affecting young and middle-aged orthopaedic patients. If effective treatment strategies are not used, it could eventually lead to femoral head collapse and degenerative changes to the hip joint. Hip joint preserving surgery has attracted more and more attention due to the fact that the long-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty are still unsatisfactory in young and middleaged patients and tend to have complications such as prosthesis dislocation and loosening[1]. The rate of hip joint revision is high with a risk of complications. Hip joint preserving surgery should slow down or even prevent the progress of femoral head collapse and degenerative changes. The aim is to postpone total hip arthroplasty as long as possible
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
