Comparison of Torque, Screw-in Force, and Shaping Ability of Glide Path Instruments in Continuous Rotation and Optimum Glide Path Motion

Abstract

IntroductionThis study aimed to analyze torque/force generation and transportation in double-curved canals instrumented with 3 types of glide path files using optimum glide path (OGP) motion in comparison with continuous rotation. MethodsSixty simulated double-curved canals were prepared with #10/0.05 or #15/0.03 HyFlex EDM Glidepath files (Coltene/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland) or a #13/0.04 prototype MANI Glidepath file (Tochigi, Japan) using OGP motion or continuous rotation (n = 10 each). Canals were sequentially prepared to 20 mm and 22 mm (full working length) using automated root canal instrumentation and a torque/force analyzing device. Transportation was calculated at 1–9 mm from the apex. Data were compared using 2-way analysis of variance followed by a post hoc simple main effect test with Bonferroni correction and a Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 5%). ResultsAll #10/0.05 instruments fractured. In the 22-mm preparation, the OGP motion resulted in lower clockwise torque and screw-in force than did continuous rotation (P < .05). In the 20-mm preparation, #15/0.03 instruments recorded a lower screw-in force for OGP motion than for continuous rotation (P < .05). Comparing the 2 preparation phases, OGP motion generated no significant differences; however, continuous rotation developed higher clockwise torque and screw-in force in the 22-mm preparation than in the 20-mm preparation (P < .05). There was no significant difference among the tested groups for transportation values. ConclusionsCompared with continuous rotation, OGP motion generated less screw-in force, lower clockwise torque, and similar transportation. The #15/0.03 HyFlex EDM instrument and the #13/0.04 prototype MANI instrument performed similarly well.