Abstract

Sap flow measurements have become integral in many physiological and ecological investigations. A number of methods are used to estimate sap flow rates in trees, but probably the most popular is the thermal dissipation (TD) method because of its affordability, relatively low power consumption, and ease of use. However, there have been questions about the use of this method in ring-porous species and whether individual species and site calibrations are needed. We made concurrent measurements of sap flow rates using TD sensors and the tissue heat balance (THB) method in two oak species (Quercus prinus Willd. and Quercus velutina Lam.) and one pine (Pinus echinata Mill.). We also made concurrent measurements of sap flow rates using both 1 and 2-cm long TD sensors in both oak species. We found that both the TD and THB systems tended to match well in the pine individual, but sap flow rates were underestimated by 2-cm long TD sensors in five individuals of the two ring-porous oak species. Underestimations of 20–35% occurred in Q. prinus even when a “Clearwater” correction was applied to account for the shallowness of the sapwood depth relative to the sensor length and flow rates were underestimated by up to 50% in Q. velutina. Two centimeter long TD sensors also underestimated flow rates compared with 1-cm long sensors in Q. prinus, but only at large flow rates. When 2-cm long sensor data in Q. prinus were scaled using the regression with 1-cm long data, daily flow rates matched well with the rates measured by the THB system. Daily plot level transpiration estimated using TD sap flow rates and scaled 1 cm sensor data averaged about 15% lower than those estimated by the THB method. Therefore, these results suggest that 1-cm long sensors are appropriate in species with shallow sapwood, however more corrections may be necessary in ring-porous species.

Highlights

  • Methods for measuring sap flow in trees have led to physiological discoveries at the individual level as well as better estimates of water use at the stand level

  • In Q. velutina, the 2-cm long thermal dissipation (TD) sensors tended to underestimate flow rates compared to the tissue heat balance (THB) method, with increasing underestimation at higher flow rates (Figure 2)

  • We found that sap flow rates in two Quercus sp. tended to be underestimated by the TD system compared to the THB system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Methods for measuring sap flow in trees have led to physiological discoveries at the individual level as well as better estimates of water use at the stand level. Data on sap flow have helped estimate whole tree hydraulic conductances Sap flow rates measured in representative individuals can be scaled up to estimate stand transpiration throughout the growing season (Goulden and Field, 1994) as well as stand carbon assimilation rates (Schäfer et al, 2003, 2010). Various methods have been put forth to continuously measure sap flow rates in trees including heat application with infrared imaging (Tributsch et al, 2006; Helfter et al, 2007), geophysical methods (Al Hagrey, 2007), and magnetic resonance imaging techniques (Homan et al, 2007). By far, the most common techniques involve using heat as a tracer for sap flow (Daum, 1967 and reviewed by Smith and Allen, 1996) including the use of heat pulse (Marshall, 1958; Swanson and Whitfield, 1981) and heat ratios (Burgess et al, 1998), thermal dissipation (TD) probes (Granier, 1987) and the tissue heat balance (THB, Cermák et al, 1973, 2004), and stem heat balance (Sakuratani, 1981; Baker and van Bavel, 1987) techniques

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call