Abstract
Abstract Mark-recapture, removal, and snorkel population estimates were compared with a known number of juvenile coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch stocked in 18 pools in the same stream during the summer. The effects of fish density, pool size, and habitat complexity on the percentage of the actual population estimated by the three methods were examined. Mark–recapture estimates were also compared with known numbers of juvenile coho salmon stocked in six pools in the same stream during the winter, and snorkel counts were compared with mark–recapture estimates obtained in other Oregon coastal streams during the summer and winter. After all pool sizes and fish densities were combined, during the summer 85% of the actual number of fish present were accounted for by mark–recapture, 67% by removal, and 40% by snorkel counts. Summer pool surface area explained 44% of the variation in the accuracy of mark–recapture estimates. Pool surface area and the percentage of the pool volume taken up by rootwads explained 7...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.