Abstract
BackgroundThis study aimed to compare three small-area level mortality metrics according to urbanity in Korea: the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), comparative mortality figure (CMF), and life expectancy (LE) by urbanity.MethodsWe utilized the National Health Information Database to obtain annual small-area level age-specific numbers of population and deaths in Korea between 2013 and 2017. First, differences in the SMR by urbanity were examined, assuming the same age-specific mortality rates in all small areas. Second, we explored the differences in ranking obtained using the three metrics (SMR, CMF, and LE). Third, the ratio of CMF to SMR by population was analyzed according to urbanity.ResultsWe found that the age-specific population distributions in urbanized areas were similar, but rural areas had a relatively old population structure. The age-specific mortality ratio also differed by urbanity. Assuming the same rate of age-specific mortality across all small areas, we found that comparable median values in all areas. However, areas with a high SMR showed a strong predominance of metropolitan areas. The ranking by SMR differed markedly from the rankings by CMF and LE, especially in areas of high mortality, while the latter two metrics did not differ notably. The ratio of CMF to SMR showed larger variations in small areas in rural areas, particularly in those with small populations, than in metropolitan and urban areas.ConclusionsIn a comparison of multiple SMRs, bias could exist if the study areas have large differences in population structure. The use of CMF or LE should be considered for comparisons if it is possible to acquire age-specific mortality data for each small area.
Highlights
This study aimed to compare three small-area level mortality metrics according to urbanity in Korea: the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), comparative mortality figure (CMF), and life expectancy (LE) by urbanity
In a comparison of multiple SMRs, bias could exist if the study areas have large differences in population structure
When we hypothesized that the age-specific mortality rates of all small areas would be the same, the results showed that the median and minimum values of SMR did not differ notably according to urbanity
Summary
This study aimed to compare three small-area level mortality metrics according to urbanity in Korea: the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), comparative mortality figure (CMF), and life expectancy (LE) by urbanity. Representative metrics of small-area mortality include the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), comparative mortality figure (CMF), and life expectancy (LE) [1, 2]. SMR, an indirect age-adjustment method, is generally known to have the advantages of relatively low variance, convenience in calculating, and the ability to be estimated even if the number of deaths or population is small or if the age-specific rate is not available [1, 3]. CMF generally has a higher variance than SMR and can be calculated only when the age-specific mortality rate is available [5, 13, 14]. LE has the advantage of not requiring a standard population for its calculation, and it is an intuitively well-accepted measurement for researchers, as well as for the public and policy-makers [1, 6, 16]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
