Abstract
This study was undertaken to compare three procedures used in phonological process analysis: Natural Process Analysis (Shriberg & Kwiatkowski, 1980), The Assessment of Phonological Processes (Hodson, 1980) and Procedures for Phonological Analysis of Children's Language (Ingram, 1981). Questions that are likely to occur to the speech-language pathologist as a potential user of these tests were investigated: (a) Does the type of speech sample alter results? (b) Do different analysis procedures identify different arrays of processes for a child? and (c) How much time is required for administration? Although only three subjects were evaluated the results suggest that any of the procedures would identify essentially the same phonological processes as remediation targets. Factors other than these results, therefore, may have greater influence on the user's selection of an analysis procedure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
