Abstract
AbstractThe synthesis and comparative characterization of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) in two different formats, as thin layers grafted to the entire surface of polypropylene microfiltration membranes and as conventional particles, are described. Imprinting with atrazine was performed by using itaconic acid and N,N′‐methylene‐bisacrylamide as functional and crosslinker monomers in methanol as the solvent. Polymerization had been initiated by UV irradiation of benzoin ethyl ether and driven to low monomer conversion for the thin‐layer polymers and to high monomer conversion for the bulk materials. The binding performance of MIP composite membranes and of MIP particles packed into cartridges was evaluated in solid‐phase extraction (SPE) experiments of atrazin and simazin from aqueous solutions. The SPE performance depended strongly on pH and buffer concentration. Although an imprinting effect was observed for both formats, the specificity (MIP versus Blank) and the selectivity (atrazin versus simazin) were much higher for the thin‐layer composite membranes than for the bulk polymer particles. In particular, the atrazin/simazin selectivity increased from 32% for the Blank to 78% for the MIP composite membranes. A major reason is the hindered accessibility of the internal pore structure of the particles, whereas the porous filtration membranes are much more compatible with the fast SPE protocol. Furthermore, based on pKa of the functional carboxylic acid groups—from potentiometric titration and polarity of the binding environment—from fluorescent probe analysis, different properties of the imprinted binding sites can be postulated for the two MIP formats. However, the differences between MIP and Blank were much more pronounced for the thin‐layer composite membranes. The hydrophobic surface of the polypropylene membrane appeared to be a major factor affecting the binding performance of thin‐layer MIPs. The new porous composite membranes could be particularly useful as selective SPE materials in environmental, pharmaceutical, and analytical applications. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 362–372, 2005
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.