Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: Organ-preservation approach including (chemo)radiation has been established as standard treatment for advanced larynx cancer. However, in T4a disease with thyroid cartilage invasion, the optimal frontline treatment has not been evaluated within controlled trials. In this multicenter retrospective review, we aimed to assess and compare the therapeutic outcomes of total laryngectomy (TL) and larynx preservation (LP) in patients with T4a larynx cancer. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed larynx cancer with thyroid cartilage invasion and treated with either TL or LP in 7 institutes between Jan 2000 and Dec 2012 were examined. Patients were stratified by primary treatment and survival was compared using log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards regression model were performed to determine the effect of treatment and other clinical parameters on therapeutic outcomes. Results: Eighty-nine patients were included. Median age was 67.15 years. ECOG performance status (PS) was 0-1 in 80 (89.9%) and 2 in 9 (10.1%).Median follow-up time was 27.2 months. Among them, 53 patients (59.6%) were treated with primary TL and 36 patients (40.4%) with LP. Median progression-free survival (PFS) of TL group was not reached at the time of analysis and significantly longer than LP group showing 13.5 months (CI: 6.5-20.6) (P Conclusions: In this analysis, patients treated with TL showed longer PFS than with LP. This result suggests that primary TL might be a better therapeutic option for T4a larynx cancer with thyroid cartilage invasion, especially in subjects with limited nodal involvement. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.