Abstract

Background: The caloric test has been used to evaluate the semi-circular canal function for decades. In 2009, the video head impulse test (vHIT) was introduced, which can be used to evaluate the semi-circular canal function within a short time. Although both tests examine the semi-circular canal, the stimulation methods differ and it is unclear whether the vHIT is equivocal to the caloric test.Aims/objectives: This study aimed to discern the differences between the vHIT and caloric test.Material and methods: This study comprised 112 patients with vertigo who visited the vertigo/dizziness centre at our university hospital. Each of these patients underwent a caloric test and vHIT within the same day, and their results were compared. Additionally, an electrocochleography (EcoG) examination, glycerol test (G test), and MRI (performed 4 h after an intravenous gadolinium injection) were conducted to evaluate the influence of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) on the caloric test and vHIT results.Results: Differences in the caloric test and vHIT results, among those with and without EH, were observed in 66.7 and 35.3% of patients, respectively.Conclusions and significance: EH resulted in a difference in results between the caloric test and vHIT. Activated hair cell type may also be implicated.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call