Abstract

BackgroundTwo recent large randomized controlled trials did not show the superiority of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adults with ARDS. These two trials had differing results, and possible causes could be the different oscillators used and their different settings, including inspiratory time % (IT%). The aims of this study were to obtain basic data about the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators and to elucidate the effect of the oscillator and IT% on ventilation efficiency.MethodsThe Metran R100 or SensorMedics 3100B was connected to an original lung model internally equipped with a simulated bronchial tree. The actual stroke volume (aSV) was measured with a flow sensor placed at the Y-piece. Carbon dioxide (CO2) was continuously insufflated into the lung model ( dot{mathrm{V}} CO2), and the partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2) in the lung model was monitored. Alveolar ventilation ( dot{mathrm{V}} A; L/min) was estimated as dot{mathrm{V}} CO2 divided by the stabilized value of PCO2. dot{mathrm{V}} A was evaluated with several stroke volume settings in the R100 (IT = 50%) or several airway pressure amplitude settings in the 3100B (IT = 33%, 50%) at a frequency of 6 and 8 Hz, a mean airway pressure of 25 cmH2O, and a bias flow of 30 L/min. Assuming that dot{mathrm{V}} A = frequencya × aSVb, values of a and b were determined. Ventilation efficiency was calculated as dot{mathrm{V}} A divided by actual minute ventilation.ResultsThe relationship between aSV and dot{mathrm{V}} A or ventilation efficiency were different depending on the oscillator and IT%. The values of a and b were 0 < a < 1 and 1 < b < 2 and were different for three conditions at both frequencies. dot{mathrm{V}} A and ventilation efficiency were highest with R100 (IT = 50%) and lowest with 3100B (IT = 33%) for high aSV ranges at both frequencies.ConclusionsIn this lung model study, ventilation characteristics were different depending on the oscillator and IT%. Ventilation efficiency was highest with R100 (IT = 50%) and lowest with 3100B (IT = 33%) for high aSV ranges.

Highlights

  • Two recent large randomized controlled trials did not show the superiority of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adults with Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

  • The actual stroke volume (aSV) was well correlated to the Amp at both frequencies. aSV is generally plateaued with an Amp of 70 cmH2O or more at 6 Hz with the Inspiratory time (IT) of 33% and with an Amp of 75 cmH2O or more with other settings

  • The fact that the frequency used in the OSCAR trial [2] was higher than that in the OSCILLATE trial [1] would be noteworthy, and its cause might be related to the different ventilation characteristics shown in the current study. In this lung model study, ventilation characteristics were different depending on the oscillator and IT%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Two recent large randomized controlled trials did not show the superiority of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adults with ARDS These two trials had differing results, and possible causes could be the different oscillators used and their different settings, including inspiratory time % (IT%). Two recent large randomized controlled trials did not show the superiority of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adults with ARDS [1, 2]. These two trials had differing results, and possible causes could be the different oscillators used. Ventilation efficiency is one factor to determine the amount of required aSV

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call