Comparison of The Two Lipoprotein Apheresis Methods in The Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Abstract

Objective: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant inherited genetic disorder that causes a significant increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and leads to early coronary heart disease and cardiac mortality. Although this disease has a heterozygous (HeFH) and homozygous (HoFH) form, the incidence of HeFH is reported to be 1: 500, while HoFH is reported to be 1: 1 000 000. This disease is often caused by LDL receptor (most common), apolipoprotein B (Apo B), Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin 9 (PCSK9), and LDL receptor adaptor protein (LDLRAP) gene mutations. Patients with FH do not respond well to lipid-lowering therapies such as a statin, and so lipoprotein apheresis is the treatment of choice. Material and Methods: We compared the results of lipoprotein apheresis in a 20-year-old female patient diagnosed with HoFH with two different methods [double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and dextran sulfate column (DSC) methods]. 40 lipoprotein apheresis procedures including 20 sessions of DFPP and 20 sessions of DSC were evaluated. Results: When the two methods were compared the changes in high-density lipoprotein, white blood cells, platelets, potassium, calcium, prothrombin time (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time values were statistically significant. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study suggests that it would be more appropriate to choose the apheresis method according to the clinical and laboratory findings of the patient since it shows that two different methods have different effects on serum electrolyte values, hemostasis criteria and leukocyte and platelet counts.