Abstract
A comparison was made of a Tullgren funnel and a soil section method for estimating Oribatid population in a black pine woodland soil. The funnel method was found superior for extracting particularly small species while larger and woodfeeding species were more accurately estimated by the section method. For 8 out of 12 species investigated, the section method was more efficient in comparison to the funnel method. The relative efficiency of the two methods did not vary significantly according to season. Advantages, disadvantages, and scope of each method are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
