Abstract
Two approaches to pre-rut weaning, abrupt and interval weaning, were examined each in 2 years. The abrupt-wean group was weaned in the first week of September with calves simultaneously being moved first to a large pen and then to a new pasture remote from their dams (as widely practised in western Canada). The interval-wean group was weaned at the same age over a 10-day period as a few hinds were shifted each day to an adjacent pasture, and then to a remote pasture. Each year, there was no significant difference in average daily weight gain between animals in the interval-wean group and the abrupt-wean group during the subsequent 3 weeks. However, there were substantial differences in behaviour between the two groups over 14 days of observation. The major activity was lying, occupying about 70% of the time for both groups. The abrupt-wean group spent more time pacing than the interval-wean group (5.7% ± 1.4 vs. 0.2 ± 0.1; p < 0.001). Vocalizations were observed only in the abrupt-wean group. Although ultimate productivity was not affected, higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios (0.82 ± 0.15 in abrupt-weaned vs. 48 ± 0.08 in interval-weaned calves) and elevated heart rates (15.6 ± 3.0 vs. 8.2 ± 1.9 bpm above baseline measurements) suggest that abrupt weaning was more stressful. The clearest evidence was the marked difference in vocalizations and pacing fence lines among abrupt-weaned calves. Interval weaning is recommended on welfare grounds.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.