Abstract
Objective To compare the performance of the streamlined pharynx airway liner (SLIPA~(TM)) with the conventional laryngeal mask airway(LMA) for airway management in minor surgery under general anesthesia. Methods Sixty fasted adult patients with ASA status Ⅰ~Ⅱ were randomly designed to establish SLIPA~(TM) airway (SLIPA~(TM) group) or LMA airway(LMA group) for airway management during anesthesia. Article airway handling, pharynx sealing, ventilation maintenance and adverse reactions with SLIPA~(TM) group and LMA group were assessed. Results SLIPA~(TM) had comparable total rate of successful insertion and airway placement difficulty to LMA(P>0.05). Maximum seal pressure was (22±5) cm H_20 and (24±6) cm H_2O in SLIPA~(TM) group and LMA group (P>0.05), respectively. A leak was noticed in 20% and 16.7% of patiemts in LMA group when patients' lungs were ventilated using intermittent positive pressure ventilation mode after airway mask placment and during surgery, and 3.3% and 0 in SLIPA~(TM) group (P<0.05). The incidence of sore trauma was similar in both groups. Conclusion SLIPA~(TM) is an acceptable and alternative method for LMA, exerting similar clinical performance with easier placement, less sore trauma and more stable IPPV during minor surgery. Key words: SLIPA~(TM); LMA; Airway management
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.