Abstract

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the frictional resistance (FR) and surface topography of newly available polycrystalline alumina (PCA) ceramic brackets characterised by a yttria-stabilised zirconia (YSZ) coating of the slots, compared with monocrystalline alumina (MCA) ceramic brackets and stainless steel (SS) brackets. Methods The FR was investigated using a universal testing machine. The test groups included PCA (Clarity Advanced, 3M Unitek, CA, USA) and MCA (Inspire Ice, Ormco, CA, USA). The control group included SS brackets. A sliding test was performed for each bracket type with three bracket-wire angulations (0°, 5°, 10°). A total of 225 sliding tests were performed in a dry environment, and 225 tests were performed in a wet environment of artificial saliva. A scanning electron microscope was used for qualitative assessments. The surface topography of the bracket slots was quantitatively assessed using an optical profilometer. Results In the dry environment, the overall FR values were significantly lower for PCA and SS brackets compared with MCA brackets (p < 0.001), but no significant difference was found between PCA and SS brackets. In the wet environment, there were no significant differences between the bracket groups and their overall FR values. There was a significant correlation between the overall FR and the bracket-wire angulation values (p < 0.001). The bracket slot surface topography revealed that the PCA bracket slots had the highest roughness values, followed by SS and MCA brackets (p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between the roughness values of the bracket slots and the FR in a passive configuration for all bracket types. Conclusion A yttria-stabilised zirconium coating of the PCA ceramic bracket slots might be a positive approach to apply for the reduction of FR.

Highlights

  • The main treatment goal of orthodontics is to improve the aesthetic appearance of the teeth

  • Scanning electron microscope analysis (SEM) observation in the present study indicated that the monocrystalline alumina (MCA) ceramic brackets had sharp slot corners, which may be responsible for the highest frictional resistance (FR) encountered

  • The YSS coating of the polycrystalline alumina ceramic brackets (PCA) ceramic bracket slots, in addition to the bevelled corners, might be a successful approach to reproduce the frictional characteristics of stainless steel (SS) brackets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main treatment goal of orthodontics is to improve the aesthetic appearance of the teeth. Australasian Orthodontic Journal Volume 33 No 1 May 2017 opposite to the movement force and is proportional to the force transmitted across the plane of contact.[1,2] The frictional force or resistance to orthodontic sliding (RS) is constantly present between the bracket and the archwire, and produces resistance against any force applied to move the teeth.[3] The loss of applied force due to frictional resistance (FR) has been estimated by several studies and was found to range from 12% to more than 70% in certain cases.[3,4,5,6] FR is multifactorial in nature, which contemporary studies have divided into physical and biological determinants.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call