Abstract

AbstractFour vinyl wire and cable materials were tested using five smoke toxic potency test methods: the NBS cup furnace test (in its flaming and non‐flaming modes), the NIST radiant test, the NIBS IT50 test (also using the radiant apparatus) and the UPITT test. One of the materials is a standard poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) flexible wire and cable material, used commercially for wire insulation. The three other materials tested represent a new family of vinyl thermoplastic elastomer alloys, which are advanced materials with good fire performance, particularly in terms of heat release and smoke obscuration. It was found that the smokes from all four materials are similar in terms of their toxic potencies, and that they are all within the ‘common’ range of toxic potency found. In particular, the toxic potencies of the smoke from the new vinyl thermoplastic elastomer alloys are not significantly different from those of other traditional vinyl wire and cable compounds. The results of the tests were also interpreted in terms of the toxicities and concentrations of the individual gases emitted. The fractional effective dose of the toxicants analysed was sufficient to account for the toxicity of the smoke for the NBS cup furnace and the NISt radiant test. It was not able to account for the toxicity found in the UPITT test. The adequacy of the test protocols themselves was also investigated. It was found that the UPITT and the NIBS IT50 method are inadequate for measurement of smoke toxicity. It was also found that the NIST radiant test protocol is the one most likely to lead to the smallest amount of future testing.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.