Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of a 3-Dimensional Heads-up Display vs a Standard Operating Microscope in Retinal Detachment Repair.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of the Ngenuity 3-dimensional (3D) heads-up display (HUD) visualization system for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair at a large academic medical center in the United States. Methods: This retrospective review comprised consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who had primary RRD repair (pars plana vitrectomy [PPV] alone or combined PPV and scleral buckle) performed by the same fellowship-trained vitreoretinal surgeon using the 3D visualization system and a traditional standard operating microscope (SOM) at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from June 2017 to December 2021. The minimum follow-up was 90 days. Results: The 3D HUD group comprised 50 eyes of 47 patients and the SOM group, 138 eyes of 136 patients. There were no between-group differences in single surgery anatomic success rates at 3 months (98% HUD vs 99% SOM; P = 1.00) or at the last follow-up (94% HUD vs 98% SOM; P = .40). The rate of postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy was similar between the 2 groups (3 months: 3% HUD vs 5% SOM, P = .94; last follow-up, 2% HUD vs 3% SOM, P = .93). There was no difference in the mean duration of surgery (57.4 ± 28.9 minutes HUD vs 59.4 ± 29.9 minutes SOM; P = .68). Conclusions: Anatomic and functional outcomes, in addition to surgical efficiency, of noncomplex primary RRD repair with a 3D HUD system were similar to those of surgery performed with an SOM.