Abstract

PurposeTo assess whether progressive and primary muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) have different prognosis after radical cystectomy or not. To date only a few data are available on this topic with conflicting results. Further studies on large cohort are needed to clarify these outcomes that may influence bladder cancer management for these patients. Material and methodsA multicentre retrospective study was conducted on patient treated for MIBC at 5 centres between 2005 and 2015 by radical cystectomy. Patients’ outcomes were compared between patients with primary MIBC vs. progressive MIBC subsequent to a history of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). ResultsA total of 1197 patients were included. Median (IQ) age was 65 (58–72) years and median follow-up was 65 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups as well as the Tumour pT stage, N status and positive surgical margins. Patients with progressive MIBC had worse overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.36, [95%CI 1.10–1.76]; P = 0.004), cancer specific survival (CSS) (HR 1.41 [1.13–1.78]; P = 0.002), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.21 [1.01–1.49]; P = 0.05). Pathological stage ≥pT3, positive surgical margins, and positive lymph nodes status (pN+) were also found as predictors of OS, CSS, and RFS. ConclusionsOur results suggest that patient having a progressive BC have a worse prognosis in terms of OS, PFS, and CSS than patient with primary disease. These 2 groups may require different management and patients with high risk NMIBC should be assessed properly to avoid progression and be offered early cystectomy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.