Abstract

The five machine learning models (MLM) of ridge regression, gradient boosting regression (GBR), support vector regression, random forest regression (RFR), convolutional neural network, and a metallurgical mechanism model (MMM) are compared in predicting the end‐point P content in the basic oxygen furnace steelmaking process. The prediction accuracy of MMM is much lower than those of five MLM. The GBR and RFR models have the best performance, with the correlation coefficient values of 0.599 and 0.608, respectively. The smallest mean absolute relative error value of 0.155 and the root mean square error value of 0.00319 are obtained with GBR and RFR, respectively. The values of correlation coefficient after data distribution optimization for all MLM are increased two times higher than before. The second blowing time, lime weight, and oxygen consumption amount are evaluated to have the greatest impacts on the end‐point P content. The end‐point P content decreases with decreasing the second blowing time and with increasing the lime weight and the oxygen consumption amount. The GBR and RFR models are optimized by removing the variables with little impacts on the end‐point P content. The highest prediction accuracy is obtained when 14 variables are remained.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call