Comparison of the performance of three carbapenem inactivation methods for the detection of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacilli

Abstract

IntroductionThe carbapenem inactivation method test (CIM) was developed as a method for detecting carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli, and the modified CIM (mCIM) was recommended by the CLSI for as an improved method in M100-S27. However, few studies have evaluated the influence of bacterial species and genotype on its sensitivity and specificity. In this study, we evaluate the performance of these improved modified CIM methods with mCIM. MethodsAs strains, clinical isolates from Naga Municipal Hospital and stored strains from the Study of Bacterial Resistance in the Kinki Region of Japan were used. The mCIM, CIM-Tris, and simple CIM (sCIM) test methods were applied to 120 Enterobacterales, 40 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 37 Acinetobacter spp. The procedure and criteria for each method were based on the original papers and the CLSI M − 100 S27 documents. ResultsThe sensitivity of the test methods in the detection of carbapenemase in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas spp., and Acinetobacter spp. was as follows: mCIM, 98.9%, 90.0%, and 76.5%, respectively; CIM-Tris, 94.4%, 100%, 100%; and sCIM 98.9%, 85.0%, 76.5%. All methods showed 100% specificity in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas spp., and Acinetobacter spp. Each method performed well in the detection of metallo β-lactamase-producing strains, however, the sensitivity tended to be low in the detection of the organisms producing serine-type carbapenemase, such as GES, OXA-23, and OXA-51. ConclusionsCare must be taken when selecting test methods because the sensitivity of the detection differs depending on the bacterial species and genotype.