Comparison of the ocular effects of topical etomidate and pilocarpine in rabbits

Abstract

Etomidate, (R-(+) ethyl-1-(phenylethyl) 1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate), when administered as drops to the eyes of normal New Zealand white rabbits in concentrations of 2%, 4% and 8% in arachis oil has been shown to significantly lower the intraocular pressure in these animals. The intraocular pressure was measured with the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer. The intraocular pressure reducing effect of the 2% and 4% were better than that of 1% pilocarpine; the two per cent etomidate solution reduced intraocular pressure from a pretreatment mean of 13.6mm Hg to a new mean of 7.7mm Hg after three weeks treatment, while the 4% etomidate solution lowered the intraocular pressure from a pretreatment mean of 14.4mm Hg to a new mean of 7.3mm Hg also after three weeks treatment. Pilocarpine (1%) reduced the intraocular pressure from a pretreatment mean of 13.7mm Hg to 10.7mmHg after three weeks treatment in the same group of rabbits. Etomidate (8%) solution also showed a more significant reduction of intraocular pressure than the 2% solution of pilocarpine. The eight percent etomidate reduced the pretreatment mean intraocular pressure of 14.0mm Hg to a new mean of 6.5mm Hg after three weeks treatment while 2% pilocarpine lowered a pretreatment mean of 13.9mm Hg to 9.0mm Hg after three weeks treatment in the same group of rabbits. There was a persistence of the low intraocular pressure produced by the various concentrations of etomidate in arachis oil after treatment with these drops was stopped. However, this feature was also shown by the two concentrations of pilocarpine used but not in as marked an extent as the etomidate solutions with regard to duration of effect and height of reduction of the intraocular pressure. During a three week period of topical application of drops to the rabbits eyes, the etomidate solutions were found to have no effect in the iris sphincter.