Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare Exponential Injury Severity Score (EISS) with Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in terms of their predictive capability of the outcomes and medical expenses of hospitalized adult trauma patients.SettingThis study was based at a level I trauma center in Taiwan.MethodsData for 17,855 adult patients hospitalized from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2015 were retrieved from the Trauma Registry System. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, ICU LOS, and medical expenses. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables to determine the significance of the associations between the predictor and outcome variables. Student t-tests were applied to analyze normally distributed data for continuous variables, while Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare non-normally distributed data.ResultsAccording to the survival rate-to-severity score relationship curve, we grouped all adult trauma patients based on EISS scores of ≥ 27, 9–26, and < 9. Significantly higher mortality rates were noted in patients with EISS ≥ 27 and those with EISS of 9–26 when compared to patients with EISS < 9; this finding concurred to the findings for groups classified by the ISS and NISS with the cut-off points set between 25 and 16. The hospital LOS, ICU admission rates, and medical expenses for patients with EISS ≥ 27 and patients with EISS of 9–26 were also significantly longer and higher than that of patients with EISS < 9. When comparing the demographics and detailed medical expenses of very severely injured adult trauma patients classified according to ISS, NISS, and EISS, patients with ISS ≥ 25 and NISS ≥ 25 both had significantly lower mortality rates, lower ICU admission rates, and shorter ICU LOS compared to patients with EISS ≥ 27.ConclusionsEISS 9 and 27 can serve as two cut-off points regarding injury severity, and patients with EISS ≥ 27 have the greatest injury severity. Additionally, these patients have the highest mortality rate, the highest ICU admission rate, and the longest ICU LOS compared to those with ISS ≥ 25 and NISS ≥ 25, suggesting that patients with EISS ≥ 27 have the worst outcome.

Highlights

  • Trauma patients present to the emergency department (ED) with a great variety of injuries and diseases

  • According to the survival rate-to-severity score relationship curve, we grouped all adult trauma patients based on Exponential Injury Severity Score (EISS) scores of ! 27, 9–26, and < 9

  • Higher mortality rates were noted in patients with EISS ! 27 and those with EISS of 9–26 when compared to patients with EISS < 9; this finding concurred to the findings for groups classified by the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) with the cut-off points set between 25 and 16

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) system defines the severity of injury throughout the different regions of the body. To summarize a single patient’s multiple injures into a single score, the Injury Severity Score (ISS) was created by Baker et al in 1974, which has been considered the “gold standard” among anatomic injury severity indicators. It is based on the AIS severity values, that is, the summation of the squares of the severity digit in the AIS of the most severe injuries, in three of six predefined body regions[1]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call